What’s With the Red Number on the Front?

(Re-posted from April 18, 2012)

Is there anything as close as the American flag to the Dodger uniform? It just has “good guys” written all over it. Almost as much as orange and black lettering on a vanilla background says “bad guys” all over it. Can there ever be any confusion about this? I can’t understand the thought process that would allow you to root for the black hats over the blue. It has to be some sort of demented mentality and is simply un-American in my way of thinking. A few legends in black come to mind: Darth Vader, Simon Legree, Count Dracula and that guy who competes against the Lone Ranger who always wore the dark hat. Ever see any villains in blue or white (with a slash of red)? Superman? The U.S. Marine Corps? The U.S. Olympic team? Yeah, I didn’t think so.

Photo by Jon SooHoo

But getting back to the Dodger uniform, I absolutely love the fact that it has a red number on the lower left quadrant on the front of the shirt. Common sense initially tells you that it doesn’t belong there, but its addition absolutely authenticates it as a legitimate Dodger uniform. When I see Dodger jerseys worn by fans without that red number, it is simply not the complete package.

Tommy John said it best in 1989 to Sports Illustrated journalist Sarah Ballard, even as a member of the New York Yankees: “You know what makes the Dodger uniform? It’s the red number on the shirt, I love that.”

The red numbers in front were added in 1952, mainly for television identification purposes. The Dodgers were the first MLB team to make this addition. Within ten years, many other teams had followed suit. Why red? Could it be because of the Dodger logo that integrated red white and blue? I think so. A few years ago while reading on this topic I came across a comment that the red would show up sharper even on black and white televisions of the day. I cannot find the source of that comment and I don’t even know if it is true or if it was a dream I had. So I’ll stick with the logo color scheme as the reason for the red number.

Dates back to Dodger letterhead in the 1930s.

The “shooting ball” logo has had its font tweaks over the years (even as recently as this year), but the color scheme has remained the same and the red color for the ball and the streaks has always been prominent. Take a look at the font thickness of today’s shooting ball logo and the one when the Dodgers arrived in Los Angeles. We used to see the older logo everyday in the top deck of Dodger Stadium, where the older style font was prominently displayed front and center, with the skinnier font. Unfortunately, the Dodgers updated this a few years ago to the newer logo with the thick font.

Photo by Emma Amaya, Crzblue.mlblogs.com

That uniform numeral in the jersey front has always assisted with age photo identification purposes.   If I see an old Dodger photo with a caption identifying the year of the photo, I know immediately if the author is correct or not. If the Dodger in a home uniform was pre 1951, there would be no number on front. It wasn’t until 1959 that the red number on the front was added to the road jersey. In baseball historian Marc Okkenen’s excellent historical uniform research for each team, he recorded that the Dodgers didn’t have the red number on the away uniforms until 1960. That turned out to be an error in his research because there are prominent photos from the 1959 World Series showing the Dodger road uniforms with the front jersey numbers.

Charlie Neal 1959 World Series

It should be noted that the Dodgers had different versions of the red number on their home uniforms in the early years. There were some with skinnier font lettering and others with the thicker numbers.  There didn’t seem to be any control of which uniform that would be worn. It has been recorded by some amateur historians over at the baseball-fever.com message board that the Dodgers had three different home uniforms that had different font versions of the numbers. Participants in that forum have cited that Hodges seemed to prefer the skinnier font and regularly wore that uniform. There is no authentication if those facts are true, but it makes for interesting conversation. It looks as if there was no control over the font size of the letter in the earlier versions of the uniform. Hodges wears both thin and thick versions of his number on the uniform archived photographs.

Gil Hodges with skinny number

Then there is Drysdale with the slimmer font number…

Don Drysdale in Brooklyn uniform

…compared to Billy Cox and Carl Erskine from 1952

In my biased and expert opinion, I must say that one thing that is certain: the Dodger uniform is the crispest and most perfect baseball uniform to be found in the game. It should be noted that ESPN’s Jim Caple, (a self admitted Giant fan), recently ranked all of the MLB uniforms in countdown order from 30 to 1  and the L.A. Dodger uniform topped his list as the best. If even the enemy can admit this, it says a lot.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “What’s With the Red Number on the Front?”

  1. Bluenose Dodger says:

    Great article. I hadn’t given that much thought, but upon reflection, I have used that number many times for identification. Any other color wouldn’t work and it definitely is significant in making it the best uniform in all of sports.

    My second favourite would be the Cardinal’s home uniform, but beyond that I don’t have much preference. It definitely wouldn’t be stripes of any kind and definitely not black.

    Once again, I will state, that I would love to have “Dodgers” on the front of the away uniform, as it was for a period of time. If any one team is identified by the team name and not its geographical location, in my opinion, it is the Dodgers.

    • Evan Bladh says:

      I must admit that I was in favor of the Dodger road jerseys changing back to the “Los Angeles” script back in the 90’s, mainly because I thought the city name representation was important and it reminded me of the 60’s Dodger teams. Now as time has passed, I feel nostalgic for the “Dodgers” title on the front of the road uniforms. So many great Dodger teams donned that roadie too. What can I say? I could go with either one. As long as the lettering is blue and that red number remains.

  2. Bluenose Dodger says:

    Should also add that I have never liked the player names on the back of the uniforms. I expect that came in with TV also as the fans at the ball park don’t need them. They either recognize the numbers or have scorecards/programs to assist them, plus the PA system info during the game. Just a personal preference.

  3. Bluenose Dodger says:

    The clarity on this site is amazing. Best I have seen by quite a bit. Everything is so sharp and in focus, Nice borders for the articles and convenient sidebars. Kudos to Scott, Ron, Evan, whomever worked through that. Scott probably, and he is so good we could probably say, “Beam, me out, Scottie.” Writers aren’t too bad either.

    Just wondering if Feelin’ Kinda Blue has been considered for the blogroll. Dustin Nosler is a senior journalism major at Sacramento State University, another Dodger kid fanatic, and writes some pretty good stuff. He doesn’t provide many visuals and explains why.

  4. lindav says:

    I have to disagree with the name on the back of the uniform. If I remember correctly it was taken off 1 year and Vin Sculley commented that he wished the name was back on the uniform. Unlike some TBLAers, I don’t always recognize every player and welcome the name to help me. Also wish the name was on the uniform of the opposing players – that would help me immensely since I know I don’t recognize all of them.

  5. MFGRREP says:

    I was told by Joe Amalfitano, when he was the third base coach of the Dodgers in 1992 that the Dodger LA logo has some type of change in it every year. He said it was a tradition that only the true Dodger historians would ever know. Can’t say I ever paid attention or that I ever proved it one way or the other, but it was fun hearing the story over dinner in Vero Beach.

  6. Ron Cervenka says:

    I’ve never heard that before, MFGRREP. I wonder if they still do this. Of course the patches that they have had over the past several years would certainly qualify, I guess. Aside from that, I haven’t noticed any changes since they went to the Majestic Cool Base jerseys several years ago, but I could be wrong.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress