Chad Billingsley’s (almost) invisible contract

Before all of the hubbub over the $147 million Zack Greinke contract, the $175 million Felix Hernandez contract, the $180 million Justin Verlander contract and what figures to soon be the first $300 million contract to Clayton Kershaw, the Dodgers snuck in a high-dollar contact that, for the most part, went under the radar. Granted, it wasn’t a 9-figure contract like those mentioned above, but it was an 8-figure contract, yet nobody ever talked about it – not Dodger fans and more incredibly not even the media. But what is perhaps most amazing is that it occurred while Frank McCourt still owned the team.

That contract belongs to Dodgers right-hander Chad Billingsley and it was a three-year/$35 million contract extension that was signed during spring training 2011 and didn’t even start until the 2012 season.

When all is said and done, Chad Billingsley will have spent more than half of his three-year/$36 million contract while on the disabled list. (Ron Cervenka -

When Billingsley received his three-year/$35 million contract extension in March of 2011, it received very little attention from fans or the media.
(Ron Cervenka –

Now before you accuse me of being critical of Billingsley’s contract, let me assure you that I absolutely am not. In fact, it is now a great contract for all parties involved. I will admit, however, that I was not a big fan of it at the time simply because Bills had a head-scratching history of having his wheels fall off the very instant that he hit 85 pitches – almost without fail.

The incredible thing about this 85-pitch mark is that it isn’t a random or arbitrary number – it is a number that you can pretty much take to the bank. But what blew me away most is that Chad could be throwing a no-hitter or even a perfect game through four or five innings, but as soon as he hit 85 pitches, he would have a sudden meltdown inning and end up allowing consecutive hits and often times three, four or even five runs; and then just as quickly he would suddenly find himself again and allow no more runs. In my many years as a baseball fan I have never seen anything like it.

Although Bills will ultimately end up having spent more than half of his three-year contract on the DL recovering from his April 2013 Tommy John surgery (that should have taken place in August of 2012), he will still have roughly three months remaining on his contract upon his projected return sometime around the All-Star break. But what makes his current contract attractive to the Dodgers is that Chad has a $14 million club option for 2015 or a $3 million buyout.

In essence this means that if Billingsley struggles upon his return from Tommy John surgery, the Dodgers could save $11 million by not exercising their 2015 option on him; but if he comes back strong (and there’s no reason to think that he won’t), they can pay him the $14 million for the 2015 season, which will most likely be under the going rate for a top-of-the-rotation free agent starter next off-season. The big question, of course, is will Billingsley still be considered a top-of-the-rotation starter less that two years after Tommy John surgery?

I’m sure that I am not the only Dodger fan who had visions of the lefty/righty duo of Clayton Kershaw and Chad Billingsley becoming the next Koufax and Drysdale; in fact, I actually heard this quite often. But realistically, it is now far more likely that it will be Kershaw and Zack Greinke who will draw these comparisons, not Kershaw and Billingsley. If baseball has taught us anything, it has taught us the the game waits for no one – especially for those who spend an excessive amount of time on the disabled list.

There was once a time when fans compared Kershaw and Billingsley to this famous Dodger duo, but not anymore. (AP Photo)

There was once a time when fans compared Kershaw and Billingsley to this famous Dodger duo – but not anymore. (AP Photo)

To his credit, it takes only a quick glance at Billingsley’s career numbers to realize that he has been pretty good in his eight major league seasons – all with the Dodgers. The 29-year-old Defiance, Ohio native has a career 81-61 record with a career ERA of 3.65. He has a career K/9 ratio of 7.9 (good), a career BB/9 ratio of 3.8 (not good), and a career K/BB ratio of 2.11 (bad). He also has a career WHIP of 1.361, which is more indicative of a back-of-the-rotation guy rather than a top-of-the-rotation guy. By comparison, Kershaw’s and Greinke’s career WHIP are 1.092 and 1.233 respectively (Koufax’s was 1.106 and Drysdale’s 1.148).

While no one knows for sure how effective Billingsley will be when he returns from his Tommy John surgery, both he and the Dodgers are in a pretty good position contract-wise; and I, for one, hope that he puts himself in a position where the Dodgers can’t wait to pick up his option for 2015.


You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Chad Billingsley’s (almost) invisible contract”

  1. OldBrooklynFan says:

    Two of my favorite Dodgers are Chad Billingley and Andre Ethier. They seem to have been through thick and thin with the team. It’s almost amazing how they’ve remained with the team. I don’t know how many times I thought I’ve seen the last of them. For some reason I keep wanting them to stay and for some reason they’ve done just that.

    • Ron Cervenka says:

      It’s very difficult for a team to unload these huge contracts, Joe – $35M in Billingsley’s case and $85M in Ethier’s case. Once you sign guys to contracts like these, you are stuck with them – good or bad.

      It’s going to be very difficult for the Dodgers to justify Chad’s $14M option for 2015. He is a number 3 or 4 at best or may even become a reliever if the Dodgers can snag Tanaka or Price, but $14M is a lot of money for a reliever.

      Chad definitely has his work cut out for him. I look forward to seeing him rehab at Rancho.

  2. Bluenose Dodger says:

    I hope Chad comes back strongly after the surgery. But yes his future as a Dodger is far from secure: $$$$ and other starters present and on the way up.

    I have given up on making comparisons with former Dodgers. At one time I felt maybe Matt and Andre were a Duke Snider/Carl Furillo combination. It didn’t take very long to figure out they will never be close to that.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress